Advocating for the right of consenting adults to share and enjoy love, sex, residence, and marriage without limits on the gender, number, or relation of participants. Full marriage equality is a basic human right.
Del. Neil Parrott, R-Washington, offered a defeated amendment to allow polygamy and later withdrew one to allow incestuous marriage.
To prevent spam, comments will have to be approved, so your comment may not appear for several hours. Feedback is welcome, including disagreement. I only delete/reject/mark as spam: spam, vulgar or hateful attacks, repeated spouting of bigotry from the same person that does not add to the discussion, and the like. I will not reject comments based on disagreement, but if you don't think consenting adults should be free to love each other, then I do not consent to have you repeatedly spout hate on my blog without adding anything to the discourse.
If you want to write to me privately, then either contact me on Facebook, email me at fullmarriageequality at protonmail dot com, or tell me in your comment that you do NOT want it published. Otherwise, anything you write here is fair game to be used in a subsequent entry. If you want to be anonymous, that is fine.
IT IS OK TO TALK ABOUT SEX IN YOUR COMMENTS, BUT PLEASE CHOOSE YOUR WORDS CAREFULLY AS I WANT THIS BLOG TO BE AS "SAFE FOR WORK" AS POSSIBLE. If your comment includes graphic descriptions of activity involving minors, it's not going to get published.
![Non-Monogamy Diagram [I:FV]](http://www.obsidianfields.com/lj/nonmonogamy2.5.1.gif){kind=link}
Sadly, I think he (Parrott) did that as a strategy to try and kill the bill.
ReplyDeleteIf so, the others should have taken the opportunity to make a bold move by keeping the amendments and adopting the bill. Do they really think they're going to lose any MORE voters for going for FULL marriage equality than they will lose for passing the freedom to marry for (some_ same-sex couples? I doubt it.
ReplyDeleteYeah, they should have; it would have been the high ground. But, I think there is still a great deal of perceived political liability attached to poly and consang marriage. Along with your thrown-under-the-bus train of thought, they still want to advocate same-sex marriage as legally unconnected to poly/consang (but, of course, they are intimately connected... pun intended). Politics, being what it is, is subject to extra-legal concepts like disgust and popularity. I see it as more likely that legislative normalization of same-sex marriage will make it easier for the judicial side to introduce marriage equality for poly and consang relationships.
ReplyDelete