Let's consider this statement closely.
I definitely believe it is disgusting and wrong for a father and daughter to have a sexual relationship.
What would make it wrong for two (or more) individuals, who aren't cheating, who are capable of consenting, to consent to sex? Is sex itself wrong? Or do you believe that it is only right to have sex under certain conditions in addition to consent and being free to take on a new partner? What would those conditions be? Regardless, your claim that it is wrong shouldn't have power over the rights of anyone else.
I thought it was illegal in most states no matter if it is consensual or not.
Unconstitutional laws do still remain on the books that criminalize this in 48 states. That means in two states, there is no such law. What is your objection in those two states? Or the many countries with no ridiculous laws.to that effect?
I can’t imagine doing that.
Then don't. Nobody is saying you have to.
I can't imagine running a marathon. Does that mean nobody else should be free to do so?
The fact is, human sexuality and relationships are diverse. Not everyone is going to want the same things. And that's OK! There is no good reason to try to deny people the relationships to which they've mutually agreed.
There are women who have been consanguinamorous with their genetic fathers. Some have been together until their father's death, in a loving relationship with no regrets (other than not starting sooner). Why should they be denied their rights just because someone else doesn't like their love? There's no good reason.
We need to support relationship rights for all, and full marriage equality.
Good post. Many people need to read this
ReplyDeleteI agree.
Delete