John Shore gave poly-friendly response to a letter he got.
One of the places you can find it is huffingtonpost.com. Click through his links to his other writings. They are worth a read, especially if you identify as Christian or otherwise deal with people who are anti-equality who do identify as Christian. As I've said before, you can find allies (and people who want equality but are denied) in just about every religion, in Atheist circles... everywhere. And, unfortunately, you can find prejudice just about everywhere, too, although obviously Atheists will not invoke some religion-based dictate in opposition to equality.
From the concerned letter-writer...
Here's the situation: My sister has come to me and told me that she
has decided to be in a three-person relationship. My husband and I met
the guy in the relationship last week (at the time she just told us he
was her boyfriend). But now she has told us the truth, and is asking us
to meet the woman this week. We are supposed to keep this a secret from
our parents.
I don't want to meet her. My husband doesn't want to meet her. I
don't think this is right for my sister, and I want to find a way to
tell her.
It isn't up for us to decide what is right for other adults in their personal relationships. As long as someone isn't being abused, trying to intervene is pointless.
The back-story on this is that my sister has just come out of
an awful divorce. She got married too young (she was 21, and had never
lived as an adult on her own). Since her divorce, she has not taken any
time to be alone. She has searched out sexual experiences of all
spectrums. So although this is different -- it seems to be a loving
committed relationship -- to me it just feels like an extension of her
sexual freedom spree.
Hmm. If it is a "loving committed relationship" then what's the problem? Even if this is an extension of her "sexual freedom spree," what would be wrong with that? Shouldn't every adult be free to be with other adults? But this could be something she has thought about a lot, and it could be what she wants for the rest of her life. Pertaining to her not having had any time to be alone... I enjoyed having time to be alone. I would recommend it to just about everyone. But for so much of human history, many people have done just fine without having had any time alone. For most of US history, most women (and almost as many men) never lived alone. They lived in the family home or relatives until they married, which was often early compared to today. If not living at home, they had a literal roommate.
I hate the way that I feel about this. I feel like I am
spewing out the very same sort of hate and bigotry that I condemn. Yet
on the same time I feel on a gut level that this is wrong. Mostly just
wrong for her, but also wrong. And I can't sort out my feelings; I can't
tell if they're a remnant from my upbringing, or if it's my conscience
telling me to take responsibility for my kid sister (which I can't, of
course; she's an adult).
The good thing is that she's seeking to do what's fair. Unfortunately, the "monogamy is the only way" error has been so thoroughly drilled into her, like so many of us.
From Shore's response...
The first thing I'd recommend is to read this interview, which I did
with a woman in a polyamorous (meaning more than two people)
relationship: 1 Man, 2 Women in a Polyamorous Relationship. I can't imagine you not finding it helpful.
Like I said, follow the links.
I don't understand why you and your husband are so against meeting
the other woman. What do you have to lose? Meeting her means having a
lot more information about what your sister's getting involved in. How
could that be bad? At any rate, by refusing to meet her you pretty much
forfeit your right to have an opinion about your sister's relationship
with her. You wouldn't care what someone who's never met him thinks
about your husband -- much less your relationship to him -- would you?
Yes!
Here's the thing: Your sister is either going through a phase that
will pass, or she's really in love with these two people, and they
really love her, and the three of them are going to live happily ever
after. Either way, your job remains the same: to love and support your
sister.
There are other possibilities. Even if this relationship doesn't last, her sister might continue to live as a polyamorous woman.
Bottom line: You can, and should, share with your sister your
concerns, thoughts, fears, prejudices -- all of it. You get to talk
about you. But you don't get to talk about her: you don't get to
tell her who she is, or who she should be. You can share with her, for
instance, that you genuinely can't understand how a person can love two
people in the way that most people love one. But you can't say that no
one can love two people in the way most people love one. The
former is about you, which is fine. The latter is about her and everyone
else, which is beyond your rightful purview.
Yes!
Want to have a good relationship with your parent, sibling, or child? BE THERE for them when they come out or have a person or people they want you to meet.
No comments:
Post a Comment
To prevent spam, comments will have to be approved, so your comment may not appear for several hours. Feedback is welcome, including disagreement. I only delete/reject/mark as spam: spam, vulgar or hateful attacks, repeated spouting of bigotry from the same person that does not add to the discussion, and the like. I will not reject comments based on disagreement, but if you don't think consenting adults should be free to love each other, then I do not consent to have you repeatedly spout hate on my blog without adding anything to the discourse.
If you want to write to me privately, then either contact me on Facebook, email me at fullmarriageequality at protonmail dot com, or tell me in your comment that you do NOT want it published. Otherwise, anything you write here is fair game to be used in a subsequent entry. If you want to be anonymous, that is fine.
IT IS OK TO TALK ABOUT SEX IN YOUR COMMENTS, BUT PLEASE CHOOSE YOUR WORDS CAREFULLY AS I WANT THIS BLOG TO BE AS "SAFE FOR WORK" AS POSSIBLE. If your comment includes graphic descriptions of activity involving minors, it's not going to get published.