Reality: Some people in Genetic Sexual Attraction relationships need and want the freedom to marry, and there is no good reason for them to be denied their right to marry if they’re consenting adults.
Because people experiencing GSA are close genetic relatives, some people argue that they don’t need their right to marry because they’re already family. However, they might not be considered family under the law, although in a loathsome double-standard, they may still be subject to discriminatory laws based on their genetic relation.
Those who are already sharing their lives as spouses, or want to, often do need the same rights, benefits, and protections as any other spouses. Also, marriage automatically provides for next-of-kin status, which is especially important when there is some discord between the lovers and others who are legally recognized as family. For example, if brothers Adam and Steve have been living as spouses for years and Steve winds up in a coma in the hospital, Steve’s estranged, bigoted, adoptive parents would likely be able to usurp Adam’s rights to make decisions.
An adult should be free to marry any and all consenting adults.
See Myth: Acting on GSA Needs to be Criminalized, Prosecuted, and Stopped
See Myth: I Don’t Know Anyone Who Has Experienced GSA
Advocating for the right of consenting adults to share and enjoy love, sex, residence, and marriage without limits on the gender, number, or relation of participants. Full marriage equality is a basic human right.
Tuesday, October 20, 2026
![Non-Monogamy Diagram [I:FV]](http://www.obsidianfields.com/lj/nonmonogamy2.5.1.gif){kind=link}
— — —
3 comments:
To prevent spam, comments will have to be approved, so your comment may not appear for several hours. Feedback is welcome, including disagreement. I only delete/reject/mark as spam: spam, vulgar or hateful attacks, repeated spouting of bigotry from the same person that does not add to the discussion, and the like. I will not reject comments based on disagreement, but if you don't think consenting adults should be free to love each other, then I do not consent to have you repeatedly spout hate on my blog without adding anything to the discourse.
If you want to write to me privately, then either contact me on Facebook, email me at fullmarriageequality at protonmail dot com, or tell me in your comment that you do NOT want it published. Otherwise, anything you write here is fair game to be used in a subsequent entry. If you want to be anonymous, that is fine.
IT IS OK TO TALK ABOUT SEX IN YOUR COMMENTS, BUT PLEASE CHOOSE YOUR WORDS CAREFULLY AS I WANT THIS BLOG TO BE AS "SAFE FOR WORK" AS POSSIBLE. If your comment includes graphic descriptions of activity involving minors, it's not going to get published.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Thank you for posting this entry. My biggest fear about not being able to marry my half brother is that if something ever happens to me that my spiteful mother will try to take our son from his daddy. Our son and his daddy are best friends and they would be crushed without each other. I can't add my husband (half brother) to his birth certificate for obvious legal reasons. Also, we have been together for 6 years now, and have acquired a lot of "martial" property. If something happens to him, his grown daughter has every legal right to try and take anything from me and the kids that is in his name. We don't have the right of survivorship that comes with marriage and that is scary.
ReplyDelete-Deborah-
As an ally, I would just like to say that sometimes it is wasted worry to worry about property and inheritance rights.
ReplyDeleteEven where 'legal rights' do exist, unless you have the money to enforce those rights at law, and pockets deep enough to win a prolonged legal battle, others in the family may contest a will for years meaning that the only people to benefit in the end may be the solicitors who charge an arm and a leg and more. The French legal system seems to put the rights of the children first, but while it does not criminalize ACI, marriage is still not allowed for ACI people in France and that needs to change. Without a basic minimum income guaranteed for all, life will be very scary for many who have no one to support them. the right to marry would seem to be a basic right worth fighting for.
I have already written more than once in the comments that I know that GSA, as a biological, physiological phenomenon, does not exist, because it is not confirmed by modern genetics.
ReplyDeleteOn an emotional level, on the level of faith (not logic or scientific facts), people are free to feel as they want: if it is convenient for them to explain their behavior in this way, then let them believe, if they want the truth, let them seek it themselves.
I know that everything is simpler and more complicated at the same time. It's just that two people of the opposite gender found themselves in the specific conditions of a long stay in close physical proximity, under the same roof, and a spark "flashed" between them, a "chemical reaction" began, and in short, an ordinary miracle of love happened. As well as between any other persons who are not connected by close genetic ties. This always happens not only among humans, but also among any animals: the basic instinct works very intensively when a male and a female (during special periods of cycles) are next to each other.
But this, of course, has nothing to do with the topic that Keith raised.
I am also deeply convinced of the injustice of discrimination in the possibility of marriage between members of consanguinamorous couples. It's so cruel that I call it genocide.
Fortunately, in today's world, as Keith says in another post, draconian laws against consanguinamorous couples are being applied less and less frequently. In addition, the legal systems of different countries, influenced by the fact that fewer and fewer traditional couples want to marry for various reasons, provide fairly well for the property and parental rights of people living in informal marriages, as well as provide them with property of their choice, appoint caregivers and gardians to anyone, provide medical insurance and so on.
Yes, it is possible that we will survive without the formal institution of marriage being applied to us. But there remains our pride, our confidence in our own rights, our sense of justice, and our understanding of true freedom.
I am sure there can be no true freedom, no true democracy, where the rights of sexual minorities or blood relatives to marry, have officially registered children and feel safe are violated.
We are human beings, intelligent beings endowed with reason, free will, and morality. And we should feel free to dispose of our bodies and souls sexually according to our own choice, and not at the whim of hypocrites, philistines, fanatics, the church and the authorities.
We are against all forms of violence in sexual identification and choice of sexual partner (partners). But we demand that the principle of nonviolence and supreme justice be applied to us as well.