A poll at huffingtonpost.com asked,
"Should Groups Like Asexuals and the Polyamorous Be Included Under the Queer Umbrella?"
Although asexuality denotes the absence of sexuality,
potentially differentiating it from the more visible sexual minorities
(at least in terms of society's commonly held beliefs about them), in
recent years the queer umbrella has extended to include not just sexual
orientations but gender identities, as well, and could very well embrace
another enclave. If you look at the religious root of homophobia, the
belief that what cannot procreate is evil, and consider that asexuals by
definition are not in the business of making babies, then you might
agree that in that respect alone they could easily hop on the queer
bandwagon.
I say any consensual sexuality, sexual orientation, or gender identity
that is persecuted, discriminated against, criminalized, or presented as
not being the norm or dominant (so to speak) should be included under
"queer." We need to stand up for the rights of all adults to be who they
are and love the consenting adults they love.
Hmmm, the results were fairly even Keith, but there was still more of a leaning toward yes, so that's good hope ^^
ReplyDeleteI voted yes, of course ^^