The Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Reynolds v. United States (1878) that polygamy is not a Constitutionally-protected right. This has allowed the U.S. government to ban it. Even if the U.S. government didn’t ban, it the ruling allows states to ban it. The only way to ensure the right to polygamy would be for either a new Supreme Court decision reversing the old one, or a Constitutional amendment: the Marriage Equality Amendment. A court reversal could come as part of a ruling about same-sex marriage.
Striking down DOMA in a way that just sends the matter back to the states still leaves all of those states with laws banning gay marriage, polygamy, and consanguineous marriage. If, however, the court rules that the right to marriage should negate not only DOMA but most state marriage bans, that would be great. But what are the chances of that? If it doesn’t happen, then adding an amendment to the American Constitution, which isn’t easy, would be the best way of granting full marriage equality.
Advocating for the right of consenting adults to share and enjoy love, sex, residence, and marriage without limits on the gender, number, or relation of participants. Full marriage equality is a basic human right.
Sunday, July 15, 2012
![Non-Monogamy Diagram [I:FV]](http://www.obsidianfields.com/lj/nonmonogamy2.5.1.gif){kind=link}
— — —
1 comment:
To prevent spam, comments will have to be approved, so your comment may not appear for several hours. Feedback is welcome, including disagreement. I only delete/reject/mark as spam: spam, vulgar or hateful attacks, repeated spouting of bigotry from the same person that does not add to the discussion, and the like. I will not reject comments based on disagreement, but if you don't think consenting adults should be free to love each other, then I do not consent to have you repeatedly spout hate on my blog without adding anything to the discourse.
If you want to write to me privately, then either contact me on Facebook, email me at fullmarriageequality at protonmail dot com, or tell me in your comment that you do NOT want it published. Otherwise, anything you write here is fair game to be used in a subsequent entry. If you want to be anonymous, that is fine.
IT IS OK TO TALK ABOUT SEX IN YOUR COMMENTS, BUT PLEASE CHOOSE YOUR WORDS CAREFULLY AS I WANT THIS BLOG TO BE AS "SAFE FOR WORK" AS POSSIBLE. If your comment includes graphic descriptions of activity involving minors, it's not going to get published.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Supreme Court route is the only practical route. The chances of success are continuously improving. DOMA and SSM will build upon the foundation provided by Loving v. Virginia (in which one interracial married couple, backed by the ACLU, took their cause all the way to the US Supreme Court, whereupon the Supreme Court struck down all state and federal laws against interracial marriage) and Lawrence v. Texas (in which one gay couple, backed by the ACLU, took their cause all the way to the US Supreme Court, whereupon the Supreme Court struck down all state and federal laws against sodomy).
ReplyDeleteAfter DOMA and SSM, there are several routes for further development. Probably the easiest route is to attack the incest laws, starting with first cousin marriage (which is legal in some states but not in others). Another route is to attack the bigamy laws in order to enable married persons to participate in additional marriages (dyadic networks). These attacks will be very complex and will require extensive preparatory research and development.
Now is the time to do that research and development. If the time associated with the DOMA and SSM developments is well spent in diligent preparation, then these new avenues of attack can proceed quickly once DOMA and SSM are completed. Otherwise, there will be further delays, and full marriage equality will then take longer and longer to be realized.