Two siblings in Taylor County are facing criminal charges after they accused engaging in an incestuous relationship.
According to court documents, the defendants were reportedly 16-years-old and 18-years-old when the alleged misconduct occurred in 2014.Who was which age? That might matter, as we'll see below.
Court documents state an investigation began when a different sibling ran away. Authorities said the girl said she left because of what had occurred between her brother and sister, and because her brother asked her to have sex.How old was the runaway? We're not told. It matters.
That's when court document state he asked another sibling who consented.It makes a difference about the ages. Is he 18 and the runaway 13? 12? Or, is he the 16-year-old and the runaway 15 of 14? Notice he asked her to have sex. She said no. He asked his other sister, who is either two years older than him or two years younger than him, and she consented. So he might, depending on how things went, be guilty of sexual harassment toward the other sister, but he's obviously not guilty of sexual assault or molestation.
The relationship did not result in a child.
There's no victim. While the age of consent in Wisconsin is 18, sex with a 16-year-old is a misdemeanor. But they are apparently being prosecuted for incest.
If convicted, both defendants could face up 12.5 years in prison.
The state and county authorities should drop the incest case immediately and apologize. If the uninvolved sibling really does feel harassed, then move the brother out and/or get her some counseling.
![Non-Monogamy Diagram [I:FV]](http://www.obsidianfields.com/lj/nonmonogamy2.5.1.gif){kind=link}
This is ridiculous. They both face spending most of their 20s in jail all when there is no victim. Of course the underage sex is an issue but it's not like a 40 year old was doing anything sexual with a 16 year old... that is obviously wrong. They were close in age and therefore I believe on that count consent exists.
ReplyDeleteI live in the UK, and the age of consent here is 16, but they tend not to prosecute when say, one is 15 and the other 16, it depends on the 15 year olds and his/her family as to whether they press charges... most of whom apply common sense in such cases and put it down to 'kids make stupid mistakes' and they don't want to ruin both kids lives or for the slightly older one to end up on the sex offenders register because of it.
I don't think that when two teenagers are related it should be any different... common sense ought be applied here. Nothing they did warrants this kind of jail time. Like you said, if the brother had sexually harassed another sister then throw THAT book at him, not the incest book. Throwing the 'incest laws' book at them is discriminatory and wrong... it makes me so angry.