Translate

Monday, September 14, 2026

Sorting Out Relation

Sometimes people, especially young people, aren't certain of how to describe their relation to someone else. It doesn't help that legal relation isn't always the same as genetic (blood) relation.  People can legally be siblings, but not be close genetic relatives, for example. Or two people can be genetic siblings but not legal relatives. Relation by blood/genetics is referred to as consanguinity and relation by marriage or law may be referred to as affinity.

Generally, the law recognizes that people are related through birth*, adoption, or marriage (or civil union or domestic partnership.)

I hope this provides clarity to people who are uncertain.



Cousins: This is explained in detail here, so I will just be brief and say that your parent's sibling's child is your first cousin. Your first cousin's child is your first cousin, once removed. Your child would be a second cousin to your first cousin, once removed. Also, your first cousin is your child's first cousin, once removed.



Full sibling: A brother or sister whose biological/genetic parents are the same as yours.

Half sibling: A brother or sister who shares one, not two, biological/genetic parents with you. Because people can have half-siblings, they can also have half-uncles, half-aunts, half-cousins, half-nieces, and half-nephews. For example, your parent has a half-brother. He would be your half-uncle (although many people choose to simply say "uncle".) Note that someone can have two half-siblings who are not closely related to each other genetically.


Adopted/Adoptive: When legal arrangements were made to become legally recognized family, which otherwise happens through marriage or birth*. For example, if your parents adopted an orphaned boy, he would be your adopted brother and would be legally as much your parents' child as you. Or you could both be adopted by the same parents. It isn't just minor children who are adopted. Adults have adopted other adults.


Stepsibling, Stepbrother, Stepsister, Stepparent, Stepmother, Stepfather, Stepchild, Stepson Stepdaughter: A relation through marriage and is usually someone who is not a close biological relative. Someone is your stepsibling/-brother/-sister because their parent married your parent. Your stepsibling is the child of your stepparent. Someone is your stepparent/-father/-mother because they married your parent. Someone is your stepchild/-son/-daughter because you married their parent. For some purposes in some places, some laws treat steprelations like biological/genetic or adoptive relations. Sometimes, a steprelation becomes an adoptive relation, such as when a stepparent adopts their stepchild.



In-law: Someone who is related to you by marriage or custom (but usually this person is not a steprelation) and may be recognized as such by law or socially. The parents of your spouse would be your mother-in-law or father-in-law. Your spouse's siblings would be your brother-in-law or sister-in-law.  Your sibling's spouse would also be your sister-in-law or brother-in-law. Your child's spouse would be your daughter-in-law or son-in-law.



People generally refer to other people by their closest relation. For example, if you married a second cousin, you would generally call them your spouse, not your second cousin, as spouses are legally next-of-kin and second cousins rarely are (all closer relations would have to be deceased). Or, if your parents adopted your cousin, it would be customary to call your cousin your sibling.


*The term "birth" is often used in place of "genetic" or "genetics" but it should be noted that:

1) Surrogate mothers often give birth to children to whom they have no close genetic relation, and they will not be the legal mother of that child.

2) Some women give birth to, and raise, and are the presumed and legal mother of children to whom they are not closely genetically related because the child was conceived using a donor egg or was a donated embryo.

3) In many places, parental designation (such as paternity) is automatically assigned under the law to a spouse of the woman who birthed the child even when the child has no close genetic relation to this "birth father/parent" because the child was a donated embryo or conceived by sperm donation, or sexual intercourse with someone outside the legal marriage, regardless of whether or not the sexual intercourse was something this spouse knew about.






More terms used frequently on this blog are explained here.

— — —

6 comments:

  1. What's interesting is that anyone who belongs in any of these categories can fall foul of the incest laws if they have a relationship, and it shows the stupidity and arbitrary nature of these laws.

    For example people who are step or adopted relatives are not genetic relations and yet these relationships are still prohibited by law and prosecuted as though they were!

    I think that ALL of the laws against incest (whether sociological or biological) should be immediately deleted from the books.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You are absolutely correct! Under the Constitution, there is no definition of marriage or mention at all of it, but the courts agree that it is a fundamental right for all. Being so, a denial by anyone regardless of whom they choose is a violation of equal protection granted by the Constitution. We still have extreme prejudice and hate within our society, including the courts, when it comes to actual "full marriage equality" , especially when some relationships are criminalized! Doing so only destroys perfectly healthy and productive relationships in the name of bias, hate, insecurity, misunderstanding, and prejudice. We are still not where we need to be.

    ReplyDelete
  3. they need to stop anti-lgbtq+, anti-incest, and anti-polyamory marriages cause these bad laws should be erased from books.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And furthermore, prove that they are good people and not comparable to pedophiles, zoophiles and necrophiles (I respect those that don't act on their behavior and are looking for help and trying to change.)
      Pedophilia is wrong because children are not physically and mentally ready for lovemaking.
      Zoophilia is wrong because it harms animals.
      Necrophilia is wrong because it is disrespectful to the deceased and it is bad for the perpetrator's health to have sex with a dead person.

      Delete
  4. Thank you, Keith, for the very interesting and useful information.
    We all understand that the full legal recognition of consanguinamory between family members of the first degree of genetic kinship (siblings, mother-son/daughter, father-daughter/son) including marriage, is a matter of a very distant future.
    The movement towards the triumph of the principles of Full Marriage Equality can only be gradual: step by step, from one state to another, from one country to another. At the same time, there may be situations of "one step forward, two steps back" depending on the political and religious climate, as is currently observed under President Trump with regard to some sexual minorities, especially transgender people, or in Russia, in China, in some Islamic and other countries.
    I believe that two goals are achievable now.
    1) To reach the universal decriminalization of voluntary nonviolent sexual relations between adult people of any degree of kinship and, accordingly, the decriminalization of the conception and birth of common biological children in these relationships, with the possibility of specifying the true names of both parents in the birth certificate.
    2) To reach the universal legalization of marriages between first cousins and complete moral, religious and domestic tolerance for sexually romantic relationships between them, including the cessation of explicit and implicit campaigns regarding the idea of the inferiority of offspring born from such marriages.

    The possibility of achieving these goals is confirmed by the fact that they, together or separately, have already been achieved in a number of US states and in many countries around the world. Public and religious opinion, as well as household standards, are another matter.
    Surprisingly, for example, with regard to marriage between first cousins, the situation in the world as a whole at the beginning of the last century was much more liberal than it is now. And in the families of both ordinary people and the nobility, they looked favorably on these marriages. I think the too plainly understood revelations of the geneticists played a negative role here.
    By the way, it has now been proven that, both in the wild and among humans, the genetic threats to children born by first cousins in large populations are practically the same as the genetic threats to children born to unrelated people. The real genetic consequences of inbreeding occur in small populations when individuals are crossbred over several generations.
    And, in the end, it's up to two adults to decide whether to accept the risks (objective or to the best of their understanding) of having children together, hedge the risks in some way, or avoid them radically by refusing to have biological children together, resorting to artificial insemination or adopting.

    I want to say that from a scientific, legislative and practical point of view, the world is ready to achieve the above goals and move on further, it's just a matter of the consciousness of specific people and their communities. But this is what turns out to be the most difficult: few people can wake up from the age-old zombification and realize that what they were taught at home, at school, in church and propagandized in literature, in movies and on television is just bullshit.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi, I am still very confused. I met my half-sibling when we were adults. We didn't grew up together. We like each other very much. Due to adoption we are not legal family. Due to genes we cannot marry. So there is no way for us to EVER become legal family. It sucks a big time. I can add it up to my other trauma's.

    ReplyDelete

To prevent spam, comments will have to be approved, so your comment may not appear for several hours. Feedback is welcome, including disagreement. I only delete/reject/mark as spam: spam, vulgar or hateful attacks, repeated spouting of bigotry from the same person that does not add to the discussion, and the like. I will not reject comments based on disagreement, but if you don't think consenting adults should be free to love each other, then I do not consent to have you repeatedly spout hate on my blog without adding anything to the discourse.

If you want to write to me privately, then either contact me on Facebook, email me at fullmarriageequality at protonmail dot com, or tell me in your comment that you do NOT want it published. Otherwise, anything you write here is fair game to be used in a subsequent entry. If you want to be anonymous, that is fine.

IT IS OK TO TALK ABOUT SEX IN YOUR COMMENTS, BUT PLEASE CHOOSE YOUR WORDS CAREFULLY AS I WANT THIS BLOG TO BE AS "SAFE FOR WORK" AS POSSIBLE. If your comment includes graphic descriptions of activity involving minors, it's not going to get published.