Advocating for the right of consenting adults to share and enjoy love, sex, residence, and marriage without limits on the gender, number, or relation of participants. Full marriage equality is a basic human right.
- Home
- New to This Blog?
- Essential Reading
- Welcome Message
- An Introduction to This Blog
- About This Blog
- Why I Started This Blog
- A Happy Triad (Interview)
- Case Studies
- For Family & Friends
- Why Support Full Marriage Equality?
- How You Can Help
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Glossary
- For Journalists
- Discredited, Invalid Arguments
- US Supreme Court Should Rule For Equality
- Marriage Equality Ammendment
- Rights Aren't Reserved For the Majority
- Others May Consent to Something You Wouldn't
- FAQ: Why is Consensual Incest Illegal?
- FAQ: How Common is Consensual Incest?
- A Natural Attraction
- Need Help?
- We're About Love & Sex Not Abuse
- Essential Reading
- Maps, etc.
- Get Connected
- Facebook Cause Group
- Consanguinamory on Facebook
- Causes.com
- My Facebook
- My Twitter
- Email me at ProtonMail.com
- The Final Manifesto on Blogspot
- The Final Manifesto on Tumblr
- Consanguinamory Blog
- Friends of Lily
- Kindred Spirits Forum [FREE No-Porn Forum]
- Brothers & Sisters Forum
- Genetic Reunion Group [Yahoo!]
- Genetic Attraction Forums
- Reddit: r/incest
- Reddit: r/incest_relationships [Private]
- Topics
- For More Info
- The Final Manifesto on Tumblr
- Consanguinamory Blog
- Friends of Lily
- Consanguinamory Wiki
- The Polyamory Wiki
- CousinCouples.com
- Nat'l Society of Genetic Counselors
- The Center for Sex-Positive Culture
- Nat'l Coalition for Sexual Freedom
- Consenting Adult Action Network
- World Polyamory Association
- Canadian Poly Advocacy Assoc.
- Polyamory in Australia
- Polytical.org [UK]
- PolyFamilies.com
- Polyamory.com
- PolyamoryOnline.org
- ChristianPolygamy.com
- Charlie Glickman [PhD SexEd]
Translate
Sunday, May 28, 2017
Memorial Day Holiday
Some of our fallen were LGBT, some were poly. Some were consanguinamorous. Until somewhat recently, none of them could be open about who they were or who they loved without dire consequences; only some of our LGBT military personnel have been able to come out thanks to the end of DADT. Yet along with the rest of their military brothers and sisters, they fought for freedom.
So please let freedom ring.
Someone should be able to serve no matter their sexual orientation or their relationships with consenting adults. And they should be able to have their marriages legalized, and certainly not punished for their relationship.
2 comments:
To prevent spam, comments will have to be approved, so your comment may not appear for several hours. Feedback is welcome, including disagreement. I only delete/reject/mark as spam: spam, vulgar or hateful attacks, repeated spouting of bigotry from the same person that does not add to the discussion, and the like. I will not reject comments based on disagreement, but if you don't think consenting adults should be free to love each other, then I do not consent to have you repeatedly spout hate on my blog without adding anything to the discourse.
If you want to write to me privately, then either contact me on Facebook, email me at fullmarriageequality at protonmail dot com, or tell me in your comment that you do NOT want it published. Otherwise, anything you write here is fair game to be used in a subsequent entry. If you want to be anonymous, that is fine.
IT IS OK TO TALK ABOUT SEX IN YOUR COMMENTS, BUT PLEASE CHOOSE YOUR WORDS CAREFULLY AS I WANT THIS BLOG TO BE AS "SAFE FOR WORK" AS POSSIBLE. If your comment includes graphic descriptions of activity involving minors, it's not going to get published.
You should be able to serve in the armed forces no matter who your partner is, and yes that means even if it's a relative. It's time we legalize all consensual relationships including Consanguinamorous ones so that those serving in the armed forces aren't discriminated against and can share their love openly without having to worry about being bulled, discriminated against, or shamed.
ReplyDeleteI prefer "decriminalization" over "legalization." What's the difference?
ReplyDeleteLegalization is when we beg bureaucrats for rights which naturally belong to us, and then they graciously "give" us those rights by writing them into statute, telling us under what circumstances we may exercise our natural rights. Inherent in this system and this process is our acknowledgment that these other human beings have some kind of authority over us, and that we require and/or value their approval.
Decriminalization is when the above-mentioned megalomaniacal bureaucrats realize that the issue at hand (in this case, relationships between consenting adults) is none of their business, and they erase statutes that [ostensibly] give them authority to regulate us, so that our rights - which are naturally ours and are not dependent on the whims of courts and legislatures - are no longer infringed.
TL;DR: Government is not the answer; it's what's creating the problem in the first place, and we should stop expecting it to fix problems it's created.