Advocating for the right of consenting adults to share and enjoy love, sex, residence, and marriage without limits on the gender, number, or relation of participants. Full marriage equality is a basic human right.
Friday, April 14, 2017
SPOILERS - Who is Rey? Star Wars Can Advance Marriage Equality
You know the drill. If you haven't seen "Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awakens" yet and don't want any of it spoiled, just skip over this entry.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Really. Don't read the rest of this entry if you don't want spoilers.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
OK, so Ben Solo/Kylo Ren is the offspring of Han and Leia. He went bad while training under Luke.
There are plausible theories that Rey is his younger, full-blooded sister, left where she was when she was about five years old to protect her until the time was right.
I propose that those in control of Star Wars canon do something a little more bold.
Stick with me here.
Remembering back to the original trilogy (the original movie and the first sequel, "The Empire Strikes Back"), there was clearly supposed to be some chemistry between Luke and Leia. Luke sees her recorded message and is struck by her beauty. Leia kisses him for "luck." In Empire, she kisses Luke on the lips in front of Han Solo to make a point to Han. Even in at least one of the early books (no longer considered canon), there is some erotic tension between Luke and Leia. Also in the movies, when Han asks Luke if he thinks he (Han) and Leia could ever be together, Luke quickly says "no," as if jealous.
We (and they) were later told they were siblings... twins, even... and Leia ends up with Han (but not before Han expresses jealousy and assumes Luke and Leia are in love).
What went on when Luke saw her recording and the later interaction between the two of them could be described as the very real thing called Genetic Sexual Attraction. They were full genetic siblings, separated at birth, and reunited post-puberty, and they felt a mutual attraction.
So what could the Star Wars creatives do that would shock audiences as much as Darth Vader revealing to Luke that he is his father? They could have Rey be Leia's daughter, but with Luke, not Han.
Again, stick with me here.
This could be tied in to Luke despairing over the devastating attack on the attempted revival of the Jedi, and seeking comfort from Leia, and she despairing over the evil turn by her son, and turning to Luke. It could also tie in to estrangement between Leia and Han. Most importantly (story-wise), it could explain why Rey was able to start to develop her powers on her own and make her, ultimately, more powerful than Kylo Ren and Snoke.
Yes, there would be backlash from some of the audience. There would be some uptight people who'd be publicly burning their Star Wars items. However, classic mythology, which is one of the things from with the movie series draws inspiration, is filled with consanguineous lovers having important children, some historic royal dynasties (Leia is a princess) have traditions of consanguinamory, and if done right, it could do something even more important than be a fascinating story; it could help a group that deals with a lot of trouble; Friends of Lily, and anyone experiencing GSA.
The movie makers could wimp out and make Rey a product of artificial insemination (conceived in a desperate attempt to hedge against the Dark Side), but it makes a better story is she the result of a moment of loving, but conflicted passion.
So how about it, Masters of the Star Wars Canon? Make Rey more of an heir to Anakin Skywalker than Ben. If done right, the backlash would be minimized and it would be one of the most talked about plot twists in movie history. Shock audiences again and do something positive for equality.
2 comments:
To prevent spam, comments will have to be approved, so your comment may not appear for several hours. Feedback is welcome, including disagreement. I only delete/reject/mark as spam: spam, vulgar or hateful attacks, repeated spouting of bigotry from the same person that does not add to the discussion, and the like. I will not reject comments based on disagreement, but if you don't think consenting adults should be free to love each other, then I do not consent to have you repeatedly spout hate on my blog without adding anything to the discourse.
If you want to write to me privately, then either contact me on Facebook, email me at fullmarriageequality at protonmail dot com, or tell me in your comment that you do NOT want it published. Otherwise, anything you write here is fair game to be used in a subsequent entry. If you want to be anonymous, that is fine.
IT IS OK TO TALK ABOUT SEX IN YOUR COMMENTS, BUT PLEASE CHOOSE YOUR WORDS CAREFULLY AS I WANT THIS BLOG TO BE AS "SAFE FOR WORK" AS POSSIBLE. If your comment includes graphic descriptions of activity involving minors, it's not going to get published.
You're not the only one to have this idea: http://moviepilot.com/posts/3712732
ReplyDeleteMight want to take a look at this.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/australasia/incest-is-no-longer-a-taboo-says-australian-judge-garry-neilson-9599552.html