Advocating for the right of consenting adults to share and enjoy love, sex, residence, and marriage without limits on the gender, number, or relation of participants. Full marriage equality is a basic human right.
Wednesday, June 26, 2013
SCOTUS Gives Victories on Marriage
The basic gist is that progress was made, but the Court did not recognize that there is a right for an adult to marry any and all consenting adults, or even that a gay or lesbian person has a right to the limited same-gender freedom to marry.
So, congratulations to all who will now have their marriage treated equally under federal law & to Californians who will again have the freedom to marry the person they love. But we must remember there are still many people in many states who are denied their right to marry the person or persons they love.
We will keep fighting to make sure all adults have relationship rights, including full marriage equality, sooner rather than later.
1 comment:
To prevent spam, comments will have to be approved, so your comment may not appear for several hours. Feedback is welcome, including disagreement. I only delete/reject/mark as spam: spam, vulgar or hateful attacks, repeated spouting of bigotry from the same person that does not add to the discussion, and the like. I will not reject comments based on disagreement, but if you don't think consenting adults should be free to love each other, then I do not consent to have you repeatedly spout hate on my blog without adding anything to the discourse.
If you want to write to me privately, then either contact me on Facebook, email me at fullmarriageequality at protonmail dot com, or tell me in your comment that you do NOT want it published. Otherwise, anything you write here is fair game to be used in a subsequent entry. If you want to be anonymous, that is fine.
IT IS OK TO TALK ABOUT SEX IN YOUR COMMENTS, BUT PLEASE CHOOSE YOUR WORDS CAREFULLY AS I WANT THIS BLOG TO BE AS "SAFE FOR WORK" AS POSSIBLE. If your comment includes graphic descriptions of activity involving minors, it's not going to get published.
Its an interesting ruling - Lets see what happens now in terms of judicial jurisdiction of the original CA ruling & how long it will be before poly or adult consensual incest cases appear in court by virtue of the same reasoning established by this technicality about the justification of standing.
ReplyDeleteThere's no over-riding reason SCOTUS couldn't have deliberated on the civil rights issues involved instead of punting & calls into question the entire system of justice if states like TX continue to deny gay marriage rights due its federal judges alternate rulings on what are clearly civil rights issues.